Stablecoin volatility shows an urgent need for regulation to protect consumers

(Matthew Shillito, University of Liverpool) Some cryptocurrencies have always been fairly volatile, with values soaring or plunging within a short space of time. So for the more cautious investor, “stablecoins” were considered the sensible place to go. As the name implies, they are designed to be a steadier and safer bet.

At the moment though, that stability is proving hard to find. The value of one of the most popular stablecoins, Terra (also known as UST), has fluctuated wildly in the last few days, before dropping dramatically – and is yet to recover.

Before the crash, Terra was in the top 10 cryptoassets, with a value of over US$18.7 billion. At the time of writing, this had collapsed to less than US$7 billion.

Investors have taken to social media to lament this development. Some spoke of lost life savings and the devastating impact of the currency’s collapse.

And they are right to be worried. The impact of volatility in the stablecoin arena should not be underestimated and could destabilise the entire sector.

For in theory, stablecoins are supposed to offer the transactional benefits of more traditional cryptoassets (such as Bitcoin) but with a predictably stable worth.

Many stablecoins are backed by other assets (typically the US dollar) or commodities (often gold) and involve the stablecoin provider buying – and then holding – the equivalent amount of their chosen asset to ensure the coin remains stable. So while the value of the underlying asset might increase or decrease, the value of the stablecoin should at least remain at a consistent ratio with whatever underpins it.

But “algorithmic stablecoins” like Terra work differently. Terra holds no reserve asset or commodity, and instead is meant to hold its value using an algorithm, which is designed to maintain a balance between the stablecoin and a partner coin (a more traditional cryptocurrency).

In this case Terra is tied to a partner coin called Luna – and the value of Luna has crashed. Its value is now less than US$0.06 having been trading at around US$82.00 just seven days earlier. In a climate where the value of Terra and Luna are both drastically declining, the algorithm cannot solve the issue of decreasing faith in the paired currencies – and the stabilisation feature simply does not work.

As a result, fear kicks in and more people sell, just like a traditional bank run, where there is mass withdrawal of funds and sudden drastic loss in value. Stablecoins backed by assets tend to avoid this, due to the long term steady value of their peg which builds consumer confidence.

But they have issues too. Tether, a coin pegged to the US dollar, has had bumps in the road amid questions over whether the company which issues the coins hold the reserves it claims to have. And in recent days Tether too has seen its value fall.

Save the savings

All of this undermines the basic premise of these coins – that they will remain stable. Customers choose to buy them to either shield against volatility in traditional crypto markets until they rise again, or to use them as a more traditional account (like a regular bank account) and take advantage of the benefits they offer with regard to speed, cost, and ease of international transactions.

Stressed out man looking at financial graph.

But investors with their funds in Terra have seen their savings drop by around half. The fact it has still not stabilised does little to alleviate worries. In simple terms, the potential for a cryptocurrency crisis is very real.

This is why the approach of governments worldwide needs to change. While plenty has been said about regulation in the UK and the US, there has been little meaningful action.

If they fail to act, it will be difficult to advocate the use of stablecoins if they continue to expose consumers to the very volatility and risk they are supposed to avoid.

The time for allowing the sector freedom to innovate seems to have passed. Regulation is essential – to offer consumer protection, and ban excessively risky practices – if the potential of stablecoins is to be realised. That potential is something that many feel could revolutionise the global economy, speeding up transactions, reducing costs and increasing transparency.

But allowing the sector the opportunity to innovate should not come at the expense of people’s savings. If withdrawals persist, it will test both the stability of a particular stablecoin, and more broadly, whether the entire sector has a future. One stablecoin struggling is bad news. But two or more could be catastrophic for customer confidence.

Matthew Shillito, Lecturer in Law, University of Liverpool

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Miami también se queda con las Series Finales de Nascar en el 2026

(Por Maqueda y Maurizio) En 2026, Miami no será una ciudad: será un estadio global. Con el Mundial de Fútbol, Grand Prix de F1, Miami Open, Series NASCAR y más, el sur de Florida proyecta una inyección económica de USD $12.000 millones y audiencias multiculturales que redefinirán el sportainment. 

(5 Minutos de Lectura de alto valor estratégico) 

¿Por qué Miami es la capital de los rooftops 2025? ¿Cuáles son los top?

(Por Vera) Miami fue una de las primeras ciudades en América donde los rooftops se convirtieron en una tendencia popular, pero la idea no necesariamente se copió del modelo de Monte Carlo u otro lugar específico. La proliferación de rooftops en Miami fue parte de una tendencia global en la industria de la hospitalidad y el entretenimiento urbano, y una serie de condiciones hoy hacen que Miami sea la capital de los rooftops.

(5 minutos de lectura de alto valor)

El top 10 de rooftop con piscinas del verano 2025 en Miami (parte II)

(Por Maqueda-Vera) Miami es espectacular, adora el sol, por eso tiene la increíble personalidad de desarrollar las mejores rooftops con piscinas, ideales para visitar en verano. Cuando la temperatura sube un poco, te invitamos a refrescarte en las mejores piscinas en altura, que combinan vistas infinitas y cócteles junto a la piscina.

(5 Minutos de lectura) 

Un colapso del tribalismo fanático ideológico está atacando (y matando) a todo lo que se enfrente a la militancia de izquierda (¿Por qué?)

(Por una cocreación junto Ristretto, con Taylor-Molina-Alonso-Maurizio) Imagine que su cerebro tiene un interruptor tribal. Cuando se activa, su córtex prefrontal —sede del razonamiento— se apaga, y la amígdala —centro del miedo— toma el control. Este mecanismo, descrito por el neurocientífico Marco Iacoboni en "Mirroring People", es el arma secreta del populismo del siglo XXI. 

(5 Minutos de lectura de alto valor estratégico) 

Impacto mundial: ¿por qué acciones y oro marcan máximos históricos en un mundo que teme el alza de tasas? (cuando las malas noticias… son buenas)

(Por Taylor desde Silicon Beach) Los máximos históricos simultáneos de renta variable y oro no reflejan optimismo económico; al contrario: celebran el temor. En los mercados modernos, la probabilidad de recortes de tipos por parte de la Reserva Federal y otros bancos centrales convierte las noticias macroeconómicas negativas en catalizadores alcistas. Paradójicamente hay mucho de positivo en todo esto, y no. 

(5 Minutos de lectura de alto valor estratégico) 

Asesinan a Charlie Kirk, aliado de Trump, en tiroteo durante evento en universidad de Utah: reacciones y claves del crimen

(Por Taylor-Molina) El gobernador Spencer Cox (Utah) califica el hecho como "asesinato político"; Trump ordena banderas a media asta y promete "justicia". La comunidad internacional está conmocionada. La paradoja es que tanto se dice que la derecha, los conservadores, los libertarios atacan a la prensa, hoy una vez más, todo pensador, esta vez un comentarista y miembro activo de los medios,  defensor de la familia,  del matrimonio, de las libres ideas, de la fé judeo cristiana, del respeto por la mujer,  por los niños, por la libertad, es asesinado.

(5 Minutos de lectura de alto valor estratégico) 

Empresas de Latam pierden US$ 287.000 Millones/Anual: error mortal, subestimar el marketing real (phydigital) en la era crossing (parte III)

(Por Maqueda, Maurizio y Otero) En 2025, mientras el mundo celebra la IA y el metaverso, LATAM comete un suicidio corporativo masivo: el 73% de sus empresas han eliminado stands, equipos de activación y presupuesto para OOH (publicidad exterior), creyendo que el “marketing digital” es la panacea (Datos: eMarketer). El resultado: marcas desangrándose en un océano de algoritmos, incapaces de conectar con humanos reales. Este artículo no es una crítica: es un plan de rescate. 

(Duración de lectura de valor: 5 minutos)