The Final Results in the Seven "Key States or Pendulums" (Trump Ultimately Won in All)

(By Molina and Taylor) Presidential elections in the United States have never been a trivial event, but this year, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris has captured the attention of the entire world. In an election marked by deep divisions and a highly polarized electorate, the preliminary results have left many with a mix of surprise and expectation. This article explores the outcome of this closely contested battle, focusing on the seven key states that were decisive for the political future of the country.

Election night last Tuesday was a spectacle that kept millions of Americans and Latin Americans on edge. Against the backdrop of a pandemic that has reconfigured daily life, Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice president, emerged as a historic figure, aspiring to be the first woman president of the United States. Meanwhile, Donald Trump, the former Republican president, sought to reclaim power after four years of opposition. The result of this contest not only affects the United States but also resonates throughout Latin America, where the political implications are deeply felt.

 

Trump secured at least 292 electoral votes (he needed 270) according to official data, against 224 for the current vice president.

 

Summary and Tips

Summary: This article analyzes the election results in the seven key states that defined the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. It explores voting trends, factors that influenced the results, and future implications for both candidates and the country.

The Importance of the Seven Key States

“In this election, the seven ‘swing’ states became the decisive battleground,” explained a political analyst. These states, which include Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, and Nevada, are critical because their voting can vary from one election to another, influenced by socioeconomic and demographic factors.

 

 

Pennsylvania: The Electoral Treasure

Pennsylvania, with 19 electoral votes, was one of the most coveted states. “The difference in this state was minimal, making it a true battleground,” stated a campaign strategist. Harris started leading with 68 votes to 31, but as the counting progressed, the situation became more uncertain.

Wisconsin and Michigan: Changing Strongholds

Wisconsin and Michigan are two states that have historically been Democratic strongholds. “Deindustrialization and demographic changes have led to greater competitiveness,” commented a sociologist. These states, which Trump won in 2016, are crucial for any candidate seeking the presidency.

 

Trump's Strategy

Donald Trump, known for his direct and controversial approach, focused on the economy and immigration as key pillars of his campaign. “Trump’s rhetoric resonated with an electorate that feels forgotten,” said a political marketing expert. However, his rhetoric also polarized many, which may have affected his performance in traditionally Republican states.

 

 

Kamala Harris: The Promise of Change

On the other hand, Kamala Harris, with her focus on inclusion and social justice, sought to attract a diverse base. “Harris represents a generational shift in American politics,” highlighted an analyst. Her victory in states like California and New York reinforces her image as an emerging progressive leader.

Other Key States

Georgia and North Carolina

Georgia, which in previous years seemed a Republican stronghold, showed signs of change. “The unprecedented voter turnout suggests a transformation in the state’s demographics,” explained a commentator. North Carolina, while having voted Republican since 2008, elected a Democratic governor in 2017, indicating a possible openness to change.

Arizona and Nevada

Arizona, with its history of Republican voting, surprised by opting for Biden in 2020. “The issue of immigration is particularly relevant in this state,” commented an immigration policy expert. Nevada, for its part, has been a Democratic stronghold since George Bush in 2004.

State by State:

Arizona

  • Donald Trump: 51.9% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris: 47.2% (1,047,864)

North Carolina

  • Donald Trump: 51.0% (2,875,281)

  • Kamala Harris: 47.7% (2,684,897)

Georgia

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (2,651,553)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.4% (2,533,819)

Michigan 

  • Donald Trump: 50.1% (2,755,528)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.0% (2,642,279)

Nevada

  • Donald Trump: 51.4% (661,470)

  • Kamala Harris: 46.9% (604,204)

Pennsylvania

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris:

Pennsylvania

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.2% (1,047,864)

Wyoming

  • Donald Trump: 71.9% (192,576)

  • Kamala Harris: 25.9% (69,508)

 

  • Infonegocios RED: 4.5 million Anglophone Latinos reading business news daily.

 

Miami también se queda con las Series Finales de Nascar en el 2026

(Por Maqueda y Maurizio) En 2026, Miami no será una ciudad: será un estadio global. Con el Mundial de Fútbol, Grand Prix de F1, Miami Open, Series NASCAR y más, el sur de Florida proyecta una inyección económica de USD $12.000 millones y audiencias multiculturales que redefinirán el sportainment. 

(5 Minutos de Lectura de alto valor estratégico) 

¿Por qué Miami es la capital de los rooftops 2025? ¿Cuáles son los top?

(Por Vera) Miami fue una de las primeras ciudades en América donde los rooftops se convirtieron en una tendencia popular, pero la idea no necesariamente se copió del modelo de Monte Carlo u otro lugar específico. La proliferación de rooftops en Miami fue parte de una tendencia global en la industria de la hospitalidad y el entretenimiento urbano, y una serie de condiciones hoy hacen que Miami sea la capital de los rooftops.

(5 minutos de lectura de alto valor)

Collabs estratégicas: ¿qué son y por qué son claves en toda empresa desde el 2024?

(Por Maurizio y Otero) ¿Cómo las alianzas innovadoras conquistan audiencias en Miami, LATAM y España. Por qué necesitas a un Head de Cultura para liderar este tipo de diferenciales y por qué hoy este tipo de estrategias, al igual que el crossing marketing, la integración de contenidos (product placement), la expansión de categorías y las experiencias phydigitales son el nuevo abc de toda marca.

(5 Minutos de Lectura de alto valor estratégico) 

El G20 2026 será en Miami: Trump elige su complejo turístico (si algo le faltaba a la ciudad para ser la nueva capital de Occidente, no solo de anglolatina, ya lo logró)

(Por Equipo de Geopolítica & Economía (Taylor-Molina-Maurizio)) La cumbre del G20 aterriza en Trump National Doral: Un enorme impulso económico. Donald Trump anunció que la cumbre de líderes del G20 2026 se celebrará en su complejo de lujo Trump National Doral (Miami), del 14 al 15 de diciembre. Todos los medios del mundo, (y las marcas e inversiones) necesitan más que nunca tener su base en Miami.

(Lectura de alto valor estratégico: 4 Minutos)

Asesinan a Charlie Kirk, aliado de Trump, en tiroteo durante evento en universidad de Utah: reacciones y claves del crimen

(Por Taylor-Molina) El gobernador Spencer Cox (Utah) califica el hecho como "asesinato político"; Trump ordena banderas a media asta y promete "justicia". La comunidad internacional está conmocionada. La paradoja es que tanto se dice que la derecha, los conservadores, los libertarios atacan a la prensa, hoy una vez más, todo pensador, esta vez un comentarista y miembro activo de los medios,  defensor de la familia,  del matrimonio, de las libres ideas, de la fé judeo cristiana, del respeto por la mujer,  por los niños, por la libertad, es asesinado.

(5 Minutos de lectura de alto valor estratégico) 

Empresas de Latam pierden US$ 287.000 Millones/Anual: error mortal, subestimar el marketing real (phydigital) en la era crossing (parte III)

(Por Maqueda, Maurizio y Otero) En 2025, mientras el mundo celebra la IA y el metaverso, LATAM comete un suicidio corporativo masivo: el 73% de sus empresas han eliminado stands, equipos de activación y presupuesto para OOH (publicidad exterior), creyendo que el “marketing digital” es la panacea (Datos: eMarketer). El resultado: marcas desangrándose en un océano de algoritmos, incapaces de conectar con humanos reales. Este artículo no es una crítica: es un plan de rescate. 

(Duración de lectura de valor: 5 minutos)