4 New very worrying points that confuse the citizens of Florida, Miami, and every corner of the United States, after the attack on former President Trump

(By Molina, Taylor, and Maqueda) This incident has triggered a series of significant events that deserve attention and reflection, on the streets of Miami, people are outraged, asking how could this happen? There is a lot of information about delays in authorization to shoot, other news about reports of a strange presence that were not responded to in time, and the big question: How did no one see a person with a weapon on a roof, in a location that only had that nearby roof?

But now, 4 new points arise that alarm and concern everyone, and it is good that it is so.

  1. Possible Iranian plot: It has been reported that the US Secret Service received information about a presumed plot planned from Iran to assassinate Donald Trump. Although a direct connection between the attacker, Thomas Matthew Crooks, and foreign agents has not yet been established, this raises concerns about the security of the former president and the influence of international actors on US domestic politics.

  1.  What would have happened to the USA today if Donald Trump were dead? What implications would the indignation and reaction of the citizens have on their lives? Divine intervention vs. rational explanations: It is interesting to observe the interpretation that both Donald Trump and his followers have given to the incident. While the former president attributes his salvation to a specific movement he made during the attack, two-thirds of his followers see the intervention of divine providence or the will of God. This dichotomy between rational explanations and religious beliefs highlights the complexity of how political events are perceived and interpreted.

65% of registered Republicans see the intervention of "divine providence or the will of God," but the former president believes he was saved by turning to look at a screen, showing a chart on illegal immigration. For many, it is a sign more than a coincidence.

But today, the big question that no one can get out of their head is whether the current government, the current system, the present actors, the institutions, and the citizens are up to the task of clearly standing out in the event of a possible assassination of a man as charismatic and disruptive as Trump. What would it have generated among his followers?

  1.  Responsibility of the Secret Service: The director of the Secret Service, Kimberly Cheatle, took responsibility for the inefficiency of the security agents in protecting Donald Trump during the rally. This acknowledgment of security failures raises questions about protection protocols and the need to improve preparedness to prevent future attacks.

  1.  Ongoing investigations: Authorities are conducting thorough investigations to clarify the motives behind the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Although details about the shooter, such as the origin of the weapon used and the cooperation of his family with authorities, have been revealed, the specific reasons that led Crooks to commit the attack have not yet been identified. The priority of the White House and the FBI in clarifying this aspect is crucial to ensure the safety of key political figures in the country.

In summary, the attack on Donald Trump at the Butler rally has triggered a series of geopolitical, national security, and public interpretation implications that require careful attention and a strategic response from competent authorities. The balance between protecting political leaders, preventing internal and external threats, and transparency in investigations are crucial aspects to maintain stability and security in the country.

Análisis estratégico de Instagram (IGTV): ¿qué no están viendo los productores de TV?

(Por Maqueda y Maurizio) Meta está ejecutando una jugada calculada para cerrar la última brecha significativa en el ecosistema atencional estadounidense: la pantalla del televisor conectado. Con Instagram para TV, la compañía traslada su formato de video corto más exitoso (Reels) desde la esfera del consumo individual móvil (on-the-go) al dominio del consumo grupal y pasivo en el hogar (lean-back).

(Tiempo de lectura de valor: 4 minutos)

"La realidad no se discute, se mide": análisis del discurso de Milei que reescribió las reglas del Mercosur (y de la política en Latam)

(Exclusivo InfoNegocios Miami | Análisis Textual y Geoestratégico, equipo: Maurizio-Molina-Mauvecin-Maqueda-Taylor-Rotmistrovsky) Javier Milei, con la precisión forense de quien no teme a los cadáveres institucionales, pronunció un discurso que será estudiado como caso de manual de comunicación política disruptiva. Lo que sigue es análisis puro del texto, sin adornos, donde cada frase de Milei se examina como si fuera un espécimen bajo el microscopio geoestratégico.

Miami 2025: el Backchannel que podría cambiar el mapa geopolítico mundial (Putin envió a su representante)

(Exclusivo Infonegocios Miami | Análisis Textual y Geoestratégico, equipo: Maurizio-Molina-Mauvecin-Maqueda-Taylor-Rotmistrovsky) Mientras el mundo se distrae con las fiestas de fin de año, en una suite con vista al Biscayne Bay se está reescribiendo el orden mundial. No es metáfora. Es geopolítica pura: Kiril Dimitriev, el hombre de confianza de Vladimir Putin, está en Miami. (Otra muestra más de que la política o los políticos o las instituciones políticas históricas están literalmente caducas).

(Tiempo de lectura de valor: 4 minutos)