Elon Musk is poised to take Twitter private – here’s what that means for the company and its future success

(Erik Gordon, University of Michigan) Elon Musk’s proposed US$44 billion deal to acquire Twitter and take it private is reportedly coming together as a court’s Oct. 28, 2022, deadline nears.

 

Musk told his bankers he intends to complete the deal by then – and his lenders have reportedly already begun funding the deal. If he doesn’t, Twitter’s lawsuit against Musk – which seeks to force the world’s richest man to stick to the offer he made in April 2022 – will go to trial.

While most people are likely familiar with the idea of taking a private company public – the process that allows individuals to buy and sell a company’s shares in the stock market – the reverse process is not as well understood and happens far less often.

As a business and law professor, I have been analyzing mergers, privatizations and other corporate deals for over two decades. The most common question I have been getting from students and faculty colleagues is why would Musk want to take Twitter private? Or more simply, what does it mean to go private?

The answers to these question help address a more interesting one: Will he succeed?

Public vs. private

Let’s start with the basic differences between a public and private company.

For starters, a public company is widely held, meaning it has a lot of shareholders. Anyone can buy shares of most public companies, their shares trade on stock exchanges, and their market price is widely available on websites and apps.

Federal securities law requires public companies to disclose a lot of information about their operations and financial condition in reports that are posted on the Security and Exchange Commission website. Basically, anything that happens to a public company that’s of consequence to investors must be disclosed publicly.

A private company, on the other hand, is closely held. It has few shareholders – sometimes just one. It usually is impossible to buy shares of a private company. When it is possible, it is difficult because shares don’t trade on exchanges. You have to find someone who is willing and able under restrictive securities laws to sell you their shares.

In addition, a private company is not required to file disclosures or anything else with the SEC.

Another key difference is the power the chief executive has. While public company CEOs have a lot of power, that power is constrained by things like a board of directors and rules on compensation.

Private companies have no meddlesome boards or rules governing compensation or other issues. And with few or no pesky outside shareholders, leaders of private companies don’t have to worry about the effect their decisions might have on the share price.

Going private

Many, if not most, companies begin their lives as a private company – perhaps in a family garage, as seems to be the case in so many startup origin stories.

As a young company grows, it needs more funding, a problem often solved by doing an initial public offering that pulls in a lot of cash and opens up ownership to anyone.

Taking a company private, as Musk intends to do, reverses the IPO. If it goes through, the Tesla billionaire will pay Twitter shareholders $54.20 a share, which is a 64% premium over the price Twitter stock was trading at a few weeks before Musk’s offer was disclosed on April 14, 2022.

A white man in a suit sits in front of an old computer in a dorm room, as two others in street clothes stand in the door opening

A success story

So why would Musk or anyone want to take a company private? One key reason is control, which allows a buyer to impose his or her vision and singular strategy.

Once the shares change hands, Twitter will be Musk’s to do with as he pleases – from reopening the accounts of former President Donald Trump and Ye, the artist formally known as Kanye West, to slashing the workforce by up to 75%, all of which he reportedly is considering.

That’s why Michael Dell decided to take the computer company that bears his name private in 2013.

At the time, the company was struggling as personal computer sales slumped amid the rise of the smartphone. As he explained in a securities filing, Dell believed it was essential to quickly transform the company from primarily a PC maker to one focused on providing large organizations with entire information technology systems and managing them.

He said he couldn’t make the transformation as a public company because it would hurt short-term profits, which would likely cause the share price to fall. That in turn could harm consumers’ perception of Dell and lead to employee turnover.

In other words, Dell’s plan was perhaps too bold for a public company. But the strategy paid off – for him, his fellow investors and his company.

Dell himself chipped in $750 million in cash and over $3 billion in the form of his 16% stake in the company, with about $3.4 billion coming from other investors and $16 billion in debt.

By 2018, when the company went public for the second time, Dell’s stake was worth $32 billion, with similar large payouts for his co-investors. The company thrived as well, with sales and profits soaring after a period of low growth, as Dell predicted. Workforces often fall when a company goes private, but Dell’s was up about 50% in 2020 compared with 2013.

a person in a coat walks past the front of a store with a Toys r Us sign over glass doors and signs reading clearance sale

A classic fail

But it doesn’t always end well.

In the early 2000s, Toys R Us was in serious trouble. Although e-commerce was still in its infancy, it was beginning to disrupt brick-and-mortar retailers, increasing competition – especially in the market for children’s toys. A plan to sell its wares online via Amazon fizzled, leaving Toys R Us way behind in e-commerce. Meanwhile, its stores were growing old and shabby, customer service was lousy and Target and Walmart were gaining market share.

In 2005, two buyout firms and a real estate trust won the bidding to take Toys R Us private for $6.6 billion, using $5 billion in debt. Unlike Dell, who knew his business cold, Bain Capital, KKR & Co. and Vornado Realty Trust didn’t have much experience in the toy industry. And they followed a classic private equity strategy of consolidation, closing marginal stores and cutting costs.

Also unlike Dell, Toys R Us never recovered. The significant debt incurred in the buyout saddled the company with large interest payments that left little money to invest in remodeling stores or building a competitive online business. Toys R Us filed for bankruptcy in 2017, 12 years after going private.

As I see it, Dell had a plan that fit his company’s environment – a key concept in the study of business strategy. Toys R Us’ buyers did not.

the Twitter bird logo appears in white on a large dark screen as people making trades at a stock exchange wander underneath

Does Musk have a vision?

So what does this all mean for Musk’s potential success at Twitter?

We still don’t know a lot about what he plans to do.

In his letter to Twitter shareholders, he said, “I invested in Twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy.” One could ask whether that is a business model or a statement of sociopolitical philosophy.

In any case, he said Twitter can’t “thrive nor serve this societal imperative” as a public company. He’s also tweeted that he would fight bots on the social network, let Trump and others rejoin and potentially let users pay bills via tweet – part of his “Project X” super app idea.

More recently, The Washington Post reported that Musk plans to cut Twitter’s 7,500 employees by about 75% – though on Oct. 26 he told Twitter employees in San Francisco that he wouldn’t get rid of that many.

Musk understood the physics of launching rockets and the engineering behind building an electric car, but he doesn’t have deep experience running a social media platform or in building super apps. I believe he doesn’t have a thoroughly thought-out strategy that fits Twitter’s difficult environment.

What he will have is a huge amount of debt. Last year, Twitter owed about $51 million in interest on its debt. After going private, the estimates are that Twitter will owe at least a billion dollars annually on about $13 billion in new debt.

In 2021, the company generated just $630 million in cash from operations. That means Musk won’t have much cash to fund a super app or any other big ideas, unless he is able to attract additional investment in the company.

With the company in his hands, Musk can, of course, do what he likes. He can implement any free speech policy that suits his fancy. He can let Trump and Ye tweet. He can ban Tesla short sellers and anyone who questions his foreign policy initiatives. He can fire 75% of his staff in a heartbeat – something a public CEO would have a very hard time doing.

It’s too soon to tell if taking Twitter private will be a Dell-like success or a Toys R Us disaster. But given Musk has said he “doesn’t care about the economics,” it may not matter.

Erik Gordon, Professor of Business, University of Michigan

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Todos los campeones del Mundial de Clubes: ¿sabes qué equipos la han ganado más veces? (una copa con absoluta hegemonía española)

(Una creación colaborativa de MotorHome, Red InfoNegocios, XDXT) La competencia que define al club más grande del mundo: historia, datos y análisis estratégico. La Historia de los Reyes del Fútbol Mundial.Desde su inicio en 2000, el Mundial de Clubes de la FIFA ha consolidado su lugar como la máxima competición intercontinental, heredera de la mítica Copa Intercontinental, que desde 1960 enfrentaba a los campeones de Europa y Sudamérica. 

Tiempo de lectura: 5 minutos

Dónde ver gratis la final del Mundial de Clubes 2025 (transmisión histórica y revolucionaria del streaming deportivo, para la que DANZ invirtió 1000 millones de dólares)

(Por Maurizio y Maqueda en una creación colaborativa de MotorHome y XDXT) ¿dónde podrán los seguidores ver estos partidos de manera gratuita, legal y en alta calidad? La respuesta marca un cambio radical en la forma en que consumimos el fútbol global. Gracias a la plataforma de streaming DAZN, este año la transmisión del torneo, por primera vez en la historia, gratis, como nunca antes. 

Tiempo de lectura: 5 minutos 

Chelsea vs. PSG son los finalistas del Mundial de Clubes 2025 (fecha, horario, sede, estadísticas y todo lo que debes saber)

(Por Creación colaborativa de MotorHome, Red Infonegocios y XDXT) La gran final del nuevo Mundial de Clubes, un evento que trasciende el fútbol. Ambos equipos, tras eliminar a sus rivales en semifinales, se preparan para disputar la gloria en un evento que combina deporte, espectáculo, experiencias crossing y un despliegue de marketing y entretenimiento al estilo Super Bowl. 

Duración de lectura: 5 minutos 

Tampa (Florida): ¿sabías que está cambiando totalmente su downtown para ser una ciudad del futuro?

(Por Taylor y Vera) Tampa no solo mira hacia el futuro, ¡lo construye! Un ejemplo de como un plan estratégico creado por los mejores talentos fuera del sistema gubernamental y la decisión de salir de la burocracia y el estatus quo, cambian ciudades. En 2019, la alcaldesa Jane Castor lanzó la visión Transforming Tomorrow, una hoja de ruta que busca convertir a Tampa en una ciudad más inclusiva, moderna y resiliente.

Tiempo de lectura: 5 minutos

¿Por qué Coquina Beach es el destino más bello para visitar en Florida y EEUU en 2025? (seguro no lo conocías)

(Por Vera) En un mundo donde la belleza natural y la experiencia auténtica se convierten en los principales reclamos turísticos, Coquina Beach emerge como un destino imprescindible en Florida y en todo Estados Unidos en 2025. ¿Qué hace a esta playa tan especial? ¿Por qué cada vez más viajeros, inversionistas y amantes del deporte y la cultura la consideran el paraíso escondido del sur de Florida? 


Tiempo de lectura: 5 minutos 

¿Qué es el Storybeing y cómo revoluciona el marketing en la era de las experiencias phygitales y crossing? (parte II)

La evolución de las historias en el marketing. Desde los orígenes del storytelling, las marcas han buscado conectar con sus audiencias a través de historias, acciones y experiencias. Pero en un mundo donde la tecnología y la innovación transforman rápidamente cómo interactuamos, surge un nuevo concepto que va más allá de contar o vivir historias: el Storybeing. 

Duración de lectura: 5 minutos 

Turismo Internacional en Florida, Miami y Orlando: ¿Cuál es el plan en marcha para superar los desafíos y seguir creciendo en el 2025?

(Por Vera) Florida, Miami y Orlando han sido durante décadas el destino predilecto de millones de turistas internacionales, impulsando la economía, generando empleos y posicionando a EE.UU. como uno de los principales polos turísticos del mundo. Sin embargo, en los últimos años, diversos factores están poniendo a prueba la resiliencia de esta industria.

Tiempo de lectura: 5 minutos