The Final Results in the Seven "Key States or Pendulums" (Trump Ultimately Won in All)

(By Molina and Taylor) Presidential elections in the United States have never been a trivial event, but this year, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris has captured the attention of the entire world. In an election marked by deep divisions and a highly polarized electorate, the preliminary results have left many with a mix of surprise and expectation. This article explores the outcome of this closely contested battle, focusing on the seven key states that were decisive for the political future of the country.

Election night last Tuesday was a spectacle that kept millions of Americans and Latin Americans on edge. Against the backdrop of a pandemic that has reconfigured daily life, Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice president, emerged as a historic figure, aspiring to be the first woman president of the United States. Meanwhile, Donald Trump, the former Republican president, sought to reclaim power after four years of opposition. The result of this contest not only affects the United States but also resonates throughout Latin America, where the political implications are deeply felt.

 

Trump secured at least 292 electoral votes (he needed 270) according to official data, against 224 for the current vice president.

 

Summary and Tips

Summary: This article analyzes the election results in the seven key states that defined the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. It explores voting trends, factors that influenced the results, and future implications for both candidates and the country.

The Importance of the Seven Key States

“In this election, the seven ‘swing’ states became the decisive battleground,” explained a political analyst. These states, which include Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, and Nevada, are critical because their voting can vary from one election to another, influenced by socioeconomic and demographic factors.

 

 

Pennsylvania: The Electoral Treasure

Pennsylvania, with 19 electoral votes, was one of the most coveted states. “The difference in this state was minimal, making it a true battleground,” stated a campaign strategist. Harris started leading with 68 votes to 31, but as the counting progressed, the situation became more uncertain.

Wisconsin and Michigan: Changing Strongholds

Wisconsin and Michigan are two states that have historically been Democratic strongholds. “Deindustrialization and demographic changes have led to greater competitiveness,” commented a sociologist. These states, which Trump won in 2016, are crucial for any candidate seeking the presidency.

 

Trump's Strategy

Donald Trump, known for his direct and controversial approach, focused on the economy and immigration as key pillars of his campaign. “Trump’s rhetoric resonated with an electorate that feels forgotten,” said a political marketing expert. However, his rhetoric also polarized many, which may have affected his performance in traditionally Republican states.

 

 

Kamala Harris: The Promise of Change

On the other hand, Kamala Harris, with her focus on inclusion and social justice, sought to attract a diverse base. “Harris represents a generational shift in American politics,” highlighted an analyst. Her victory in states like California and New York reinforces her image as an emerging progressive leader.

Other Key States

Georgia and North Carolina

Georgia, which in previous years seemed a Republican stronghold, showed signs of change. “The unprecedented voter turnout suggests a transformation in the state’s demographics,” explained a commentator. North Carolina, while having voted Republican since 2008, elected a Democratic governor in 2017, indicating a possible openness to change.

Arizona and Nevada

Arizona, with its history of Republican voting, surprised by opting for Biden in 2020. “The issue of immigration is particularly relevant in this state,” commented an immigration policy expert. Nevada, for its part, has been a Democratic stronghold since George Bush in 2004.

State by State:

Arizona

  • Donald Trump: 51.9% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris: 47.2% (1,047,864)

North Carolina

  • Donald Trump: 51.0% (2,875,281)

  • Kamala Harris: 47.7% (2,684,897)

Georgia

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (2,651,553)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.4% (2,533,819)

Michigan 

  • Donald Trump: 50.1% (2,755,528)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.0% (2,642,279)

Nevada

  • Donald Trump: 51.4% (661,470)

  • Kamala Harris: 46.9% (604,204)

Pennsylvania

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris:

Pennsylvania

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.2% (1,047,864)

Wyoming

  • Donald Trump: 71.9% (192,576)

  • Kamala Harris: 25.9% (69,508)

 

  • Infonegocios RED: 4.5 million Anglophone Latinos reading business news daily.

 

Tu opinión enriquece este artículo:

Ole Miss creó el relato perfecto del “Fast Friday” al Fiesta Bowl (por qué Miami es el último capítulo de una revolución)

(Por Ortega) El field goal de 47 yardas de Lucas Carneiro que venció a Georgia no fue un golpe de suerte. Fue la culminación de un proceso diseñado para prosperar en el caos, la validación de una hipótesis arriesgada: que un equipo puede perder a su entrenador estrella un mes antes del playoff, mantener a un staff dividido entre dos programas, y aún así ejecutar bajo presión extrema.

(Tiempo de lectura: 4 minutos para ilusionarse)

Empieza este 2026 haciendo lo que ya los Gurús de las top brands hacen

(Por Otero-Maurizio) "El marketing del futuro no se vende; se vive. Y las marcas que creen espacios para vivir, ganarán." Las tendencias 2026 no son meras predicciones, sino síntomas de una transformación profunda en la psicología del consumidor, la economía de la atención y la arquitectura de valor de las marcas. 

(Contenido de alto valor: 3 minutos)

2026, el primer chisme que hizo estallar las redes: Brady & Earle en St. Barths (¿romance, colaboración de marca o el nuevo power duo del entretenimiento global?)

(Por Vera) En la noche de Año Nuevo, mientras el mundo brindaba por lo nuevo, dos figuras aparentemente distantes —Tom Brady, el atleta meticuloso, y Alix Earle, la influencer de la generación Z— escribían, sin saberlo, un capítulo revelador sobre el futuro del branding, el entretenimiento y la economía de la atención en 2026.

(Nota ágil de 3 minutos, menos de 250 palabras)

El colapso del consumo del alcohol (excepto hiper lujo o meta relevancia) está remodelando todo el marketing de bebidas

(Por Maqueda con Maurizio) Imagine una inversión que pierde casi la mitad de su valor en cinco años. No es una criptomoneda volátil ni una startup fallida. Es la industria global del alcohol, un gigante que durante siglos pareció inmune a las crisis y que hoy enfrenta una tormenta perfecta: una revolución generacional en los hábitos de consumo, guerras comerciales y una transformación farmacológica que está reescribiendo la relación humana con la intoxicación.

(Nota ágil de 3 minutos, menos de 250 palabras)

Rosemary Beach: es como ir a lo mas lindo de Europa y de Miami a la vez (en Florida)

(Por Maurizio) Este pequeño paraíso, ubicado en la pintoresca Costa del Golfo, es un verdadero refugio para aquellos que buscan una escapada idílica, combinando la serenidad de la naturaleza con un estilo de vida moderno y vibrante. En el vasto paisaje de la costa de Florida, se encuentra un rincón de ensueño que no siempre recibe la atención que merece: Rosemary Beach

(Tiempo de lectura estratégica y de alto valor: 4 minutos)

Paradoja Starbucks 2026: reestructura en EEUU y crece en MX (by Alsea) (¿por qué nadie te explica por qué?)

(Por Maqueda y Maurizio) Si quieres entender el futuro del retail, no mires las ganancias. Mira las energías contrastantes. Starbucks no tiene un problema financiero; tiene una crisis ontológica. Mientras en México florece como un ecosistema resiliente, en Estados Unidos se contrae como un organismo que olvidó su propia mitología.

(Tiempo de lectura estratégica y de alto valor: 4 minutos)