The Final Results in the Seven "Key States or Pendulums" (Trump Ultimately Won in All)

(By Molina and Taylor) Presidential elections in the United States have never been a trivial event, but this year, the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris has captured the attention of the entire world. In an election marked by deep divisions and a highly polarized electorate, the preliminary results have left many with a mix of surprise and expectation. This article explores the outcome of this closely contested battle, focusing on the seven key states that were decisive for the political future of the country.

Election night last Tuesday was a spectacle that kept millions of Americans and Latin Americans on edge. Against the backdrop of a pandemic that has reconfigured daily life, Kamala Harris, the Democratic vice president, emerged as a historic figure, aspiring to be the first woman president of the United States. Meanwhile, Donald Trump, the former Republican president, sought to reclaim power after four years of opposition. The result of this contest not only affects the United States but also resonates throughout Latin America, where the political implications are deeply felt.

 

Trump secured at least 292 electoral votes (he needed 270) according to official data, against 224 for the current vice president.

 

Summary and Tips

Summary: This article analyzes the election results in the seven key states that defined the contest between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. It explores voting trends, factors that influenced the results, and future implications for both candidates and the country.

The Importance of the Seven Key States

“In this election, the seven ‘swing’ states became the decisive battleground,” explained a political analyst. These states, which include Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, and Nevada, are critical because their voting can vary from one election to another, influenced by socioeconomic and demographic factors.

 

 

Pennsylvania: The Electoral Treasure

Pennsylvania, with 19 electoral votes, was one of the most coveted states. “The difference in this state was minimal, making it a true battleground,” stated a campaign strategist. Harris started leading with 68 votes to 31, but as the counting progressed, the situation became more uncertain.

Wisconsin and Michigan: Changing Strongholds

Wisconsin and Michigan are two states that have historically been Democratic strongholds. “Deindustrialization and demographic changes have led to greater competitiveness,” commented a sociologist. These states, which Trump won in 2016, are crucial for any candidate seeking the presidency.

 

Trump's Strategy

Donald Trump, known for his direct and controversial approach, focused on the economy and immigration as key pillars of his campaign. “Trump’s rhetoric resonated with an electorate that feels forgotten,” said a political marketing expert. However, his rhetoric also polarized many, which may have affected his performance in traditionally Republican states.

 

 

Kamala Harris: The Promise of Change

On the other hand, Kamala Harris, with her focus on inclusion and social justice, sought to attract a diverse base. “Harris represents a generational shift in American politics,” highlighted an analyst. Her victory in states like California and New York reinforces her image as an emerging progressive leader.

Other Key States

Georgia and North Carolina

Georgia, which in previous years seemed a Republican stronghold, showed signs of change. “The unprecedented voter turnout suggests a transformation in the state’s demographics,” explained a commentator. North Carolina, while having voted Republican since 2008, elected a Democratic governor in 2017, indicating a possible openness to change.

Arizona and Nevada

Arizona, with its history of Republican voting, surprised by opting for Biden in 2020. “The issue of immigration is particularly relevant in this state,” commented an immigration policy expert. Nevada, for its part, has been a Democratic stronghold since George Bush in 2004.

State by State:

Arizona

  • Donald Trump: 51.9% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris: 47.2% (1,047,864)

North Carolina

  • Donald Trump: 51.0% (2,875,281)

  • Kamala Harris: 47.7% (2,684,897)

Georgia

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (2,651,553)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.4% (2,533,819)

Michigan 

  • Donald Trump: 50.1% (2,755,528)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.0% (2,642,279)

Nevada

  • Donald Trump: 51.4% (661,470)

  • Kamala Harris: 46.9% (604,204)

Pennsylvania

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris:

Pennsylvania

  • Donald Trump: 50.7% (1,152,733)

  • Kamala Harris: 48.2% (1,047,864)

Wyoming

  • Donald Trump: 71.9% (192,576)

  • Kamala Harris: 25.9% (69,508)

 

  • Infonegocios RED: 4.5 million Anglophone Latinos reading business news daily.

 

Tu opinión enriquece este artículo:

American Airlines invierte US$ 1.000 millones que revolucionará el Aeropuerto Internacional de Miami (hasta el infinito y más allá)

(Por Taylor, con Maqueda, edición Maurizio) En una jugada que promete transformar el panorama de las aerolíneas y los viajes internacionales en Estados Unidos, American Airlines ha anunciado una inversión de USD $1,000 millones destinada a la ampliación de la terminal D del Aeropuerto Internacional de Miami (MIA). 

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

American Airlines le da otro vuelo a MIA (Miami Internacional Airport)

(Por Taylor, edición Maurizio) La aerolínea ha anunciado una inversión monumental de USD $1,000 millones para la ampliación de la terminal D en el Aeropuerto Internacional de Miami (MIA), un proyecto previsto para iniciar en 2027 que promete transformar radicalmente la experiencia del viajero.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

El mundo analiza el “algoritmo Messi”: cómo Inter Miami convirtió un 0-2 en un éxito en todo sentido (el verdadero negocio es la remontada)

(Por Ortega - desde Orlando -, con Maurizio) En la MLS 2026, ganar un clásico no es solo sumar tres puntos: es dominar la conversación. Y eso fue exactamente lo que hizo Inter Miami en Orlando: pasó de un 0-2 en media hora a un 4-2 que reescribe el Clásico de Florida y, sobre todo, deja una señal estratégica para toda la liga

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Netflix anuncia al mundo que se cae la compra de Warner (y quizás la operación de crossing media más importante de la historia de los medios)

(Redacción Miami) El comunicado oficial de Netflix: “Creemos que habríamos sido grandes administradores de las icónicas marcas de Warner Bros. y que nuestro acuerdo habría hecho crecer la industria del entretenimiento, al mismo tiempo que preservaría y crearía más empleos de producción en Estados Unidos”.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

El código del Ormuz, la apuesta detrás del barril de crudo a US$ 100

(Por Mauvecin, Maurizio y Taylor) Cuando los titulares gritan sobre el estrecho de Ormuz, la mayoría piensa en un mapa, barcos y un cuello de botella. Lo que solo el 0.5% de las mentes estratégicas procesa es que estamos ante el mayor juego de póquer geopolítico desde la Crisis de los Misiles de Cuba, pero con crudo, drones y algoritmos financieros como fichas. 

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Coca-Cola Argentina lanza latas Mundial 2026 que arrasan entre los hinchas y los kioscos (y contesta a Coca-Cola Brasil)

(Por Maqueda y Maurizio) A 100 días del mundial, las marcas tienen que hacer mucho más que otros mundiales, las que sean sponsor y las que no. Coca-Cola Argentina (algo así como la Coca Cola campeona del mundo), tiene una gran responsabilidad, acaba de lanzar una edición limitada de 5 latas coleccionables para conmemorar el Mundial 2026, con un diseño que fusiona el clásico rojo de la marca y grafismos en azul y blanco.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

El futuro del branding en la era de la hiper saturación: McDonald's Nueva Zelanda y un ejemplo que es escuela para todos

(Por Rodriguez Otero y Maurizio) Desde McDonald 's hasta Apple, la necesidad de innovación en branding nunca ha sido más crítica. En este entorno, es esencial que las marcas no solo se adapten, sino que también lideren con estrategias audaces y creativas. Entonces que le queda al resto del universo de marcas… solo hacer mucho más de lo que están haciendo hasta ahora y con una estrategia de ecosistema crossing. 

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)