Google vs. Europe, once again: Brussels accuses Google of abusive practices in online advertising and suggests a solution: divesting part of its business

(By Infotech and Infonegocios Miami Staff Writers) The European Commission has filed charges against Google for monopolistic practices in the online advertising market and has proposed a drastic measure to resolve the conflict. This is not the first conflict between Europe and Google and relates to Google's excessive use of its quasi-monopoly power.

  • Conflict Introduction:

The European Commission has initiated a new legal battle against Google, accusing the company of maintaining a dominant position in the online advertising market. According to the regulator, these practices go against European competition rules, and the possibility of Google divesting part of its advertising business has been raised as a solution to the conflict. In this report, we will explain the details of the accusation and analyze the implications this could have on the digital market.

  • What consequences could the possible divestment of part of its advertising business have for Google?

The European Commission has made it clear that a fine would not be sufficient to resolve the conflict with Google.

  • What other measures could be taken to ensure fair competition in the market?

"The Commission's preliminary view is that only the mandatory divestiture by Google of part of its services would address these competition concerns." - European Commission

"Google has a very strong market position in the online advertising technology sector. Our preliminary concern is that Google may have used its market position to favor its own intermediation services." - Margrethe Vestager, Vice-President of the European Commission and Commissioner for Competition.

Check out our previous report on a mega-fine imposed on Google by the European Commission:

Google, “del código de la discordia” a la mayor multa de la Unión Europea

  • Complete analysis of the new conflict:

The European Commission has presented a list of charges against Google, accusing the company of monopolistic practices in the online advertising market. According to the regulator, Google has violated EU antitrust rules by distorting competition through its technological services, such as Google Ads, which act as intermediaries between advertisers and publishers to display ads on websites and mobile applications.

The European body has highlighted that Google operates on both sides of the market, with its ad server for publishers and its ad-buying tools, giving it a dominant position in the sector. This situation has created conflicts of interest and harmed competitors, publishers, and advertisers.

The Commission has raised the possibility of Google partially divesting its advertising business as a measure to address the competition issues. This measure, according to the regulator, would be more effective than a behavior-based solution.

  • Key tip: How could this situation affect advertisers and publishers in the online advertising market? We explore the potential consequences.

According to the Commission's investigation, Google may have favored its own AdX tool in the ad selection auction by providing insider information about competitors' bids to win the auction. Additionally, it has been noted that Google Ads and DV360, the company's ad-buying tools, may have also favored their own ad exchange, avoiding competition's ad exchanges and increasing AdX's competitiveness.

These practices, dating back to 2014, have led the European Commission to conclude that Google has a very strong market position in the online advertising sector, spanning various levels of the advertising technology supply chain.

Margrethe Vestager, Vice-President of the European Commission and Commissioner for Competition, has expressed concerns about the potential harm to Google's competitors, as well as the interests of publishers and the increased costs for advertisers. According to Vestager, if confirmed, these practices would be illegal under EU competition rules.

  • Google, on the other hand, has responded to the accusations by claiming that its advertising technology tools.

Google, on the other hand, has responded to the accusations by claiming that its advertising technology tools contribute to financing website and app content and enable businesses to effectively reach new customers. The company has stated that the Commission's investigation focuses on a limited aspect of its advertising business and has rejected the allegations.

  • What will happen next?

This conflict between the European Commission and Google could result in a significant fine for the company, as well as the obligation to divest part of its advertising business in Europe. The consequences of these actions could have a significant impact on the digital market and bring about changes in how technology companies operate in Europe.

The European Commission's accusation against Google for monopolistic practices in the online advertising market raises important questions about competition and fairness in the digital sector. As this conflict unfolds and decisions are made, it will be crucial to observe how competition concerns are addressed and what measures are implemented to ensure a fair and transparent market.

The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future investigations and regulations in the online advertising field.

Tu opinión enriquece este artículo:

¿Te perdiste de leer esto? Las 10 notas más leídas que todo ejecutivo, inversionista y trendsetter se devoró en 2025

(Por J. Romanazzi y M. Maurizio) En 2025, en el corazón del ecosistema de negocios más dinámico de las Américas, estas diez notas de InfoNegocios Miami no solo generaron miles de lecturas; se convirtieron en artefactos culturales, en puntos de referencia en las conversaciones de alto nivel, desde los boardrooms de Brickell hasta las terrazas de Wynwood, desde Madrid, hasta Buenos Aires.  Estas notas cambiaron la visión porque tienen algo más que solo “la noticia”.

(Artículo de alto contenido estratégico: Lectura 3 minutos)

Cape San Blas: el “lujo sin cartel” del Panhandle que está redibujando el mapa turístico de Florida (y que Miami aún no explota)

(Por Vera - Maqueda) Mientras el algoritmo global insiste en los mismos nombres —Miami Beach, Key West, Orlando, incluso el corredor 30A—, en el noroeste de Florida sucede algo más sofisticado: Cape San Blas (Gulf County, cerca de Port St. Joe) se consolida como uno de los destinos más codiciados por quienes buscan belleza radical, privacidad real y naturaleza con estándares casi científicos. 

(Tiempo de lectura: 4 minutos para enamorarse)

Haulover Beach y el "nuevo lujo desnudo": cómo el nudismo en Florida se convirtió en la industria millonaria que todos quiere ver

(Por Vera, con la colaboración de Maurizio) En un estado donde el exceso es moneda corriente, la última frontera del lujo no es lo que se exhibe, sino lo que se deja de exhibir. Mientras Miami construye rascacielos más altos y yates más largos, una industria paralela —silenciosa, sofisticada y sorprendentemente rentable— crece a ritmo del 12% anual: el turismo nudista premium.

(Artículo de alto contenido estratégico: Lectura 3 minutos)

El Head de Cultura, el rol absolutamente clave hoy en las empresas tops de USA (que aún en Latinoamérica no se ha implementado)

(Por Juan Maqueda, Marcelo Maurizio y Estely Rotmistrovsky, desde Miami) En la actualidad, el Head de Cultura (también conocido como Chief Culture Officer o Director de Cultura o el Co-Ceo) es un puesto cada vez más relevante en las empresas, tanto en línea como fuera de línea. En esta nota te contamos sobre casos concretos de éxito de este rol en USA, Europa y América Latina.

(Tiempo de lectura estratégica y de alto valor: 4 minutos)

Inter Miami y su plan maestro: cómo Giovani Lo Celso se convierte en la pieza clave del triángulo argentino para conquistar anglolatina

(Por Cánepa-Otero-Maquea-Maurizio) La inminente llegada de Giovani Lo Celso no es una simple contratación: es la consolidación de un ecosistema futbolístico argentino en suelo norteamericano, el golpe maestro que convierte a Miami en la extensión oficial de la Scaloneta y la jugada que redefinirá el balance de poder en la MLS para la próxima década.

(Tiempo de lectura: 4 minutos para ilusionarse)

2026, la muerte del "No Lugar": ¿Qué es y por qué McDonald 's, KFC y todo el retail deben abandonarlo?

(Por Otero-Maqueda-Maurizio) La gran ruptura: cómo el "No Lugar", como Marc Augé moldeó este concepto que definió es sistema de crecimiento del capitalismo global y por qué su era terminó. Comprender esta transición no es una opción; es la clave “estratégica” de supervivencia en el retail y la gastronomía de 2026.

(Artículo de alto contenido estratégico: Lectura 3 minutos)