Paws for thought: the pros and cons of a pet-friendly office

(Janette Young, University of South Australia and Saravana Kumar, University of South Australia) For you and your pooch a pet-friendly workplace may seem a no-brainer.

More of us are facing pet separation anxiety than ever before. Dog ownership surged with pandemic lockdowns and working from home. Now, with the boundaries between work and home already so blurred, shouldn’t every inclusive, caring employer embrace an open-doggy-door policy?

What’s the harm? After all, isn’t there a growing body of research showing the benefits of pets in the workplaces?

Maybe. Yes, pets certainly can bring benefits to the workplace. These include reducing stress and improving social interaction and job satisfaction.

But the same studies showing benefits, and that most people support pet-friendly workplace, also highlight the risks, hazards and concerns that must be considered for a pet-friendly workplace to be inclusive, equitable and sustainable.

Smiling young usinesswoman playing with golden retriever dog in office

Dogs aren’t for everyone

Not everyone loves dogs. Some people just don’t like them, and a small percentage fear them – a condition called cynophobia.

A commonly reported number of how many this affects is 5% of the population, but this is likely US-specific, with rates differing by country and culture. Global studies suggest about 3.8% have a lifetime animal phobia (2% of men, 5.4% of women), including dogs and cats.

About 10–20% of the global population are allergic to dogs or cats. This rate is increasing.

But 100% of workers have a right to feel safe and not have their health compromised at work.

This doesn’t automatically rule out a pet-friendly policy, but it does require exploring and addressing all these issues adequately.

Equity matters

Does everyone get to bring their pet to work?

If the boss can because they have a separate office but those sharing a open-plan space can’t, it’s likely to cause resentment.

The time spent petting, feeding or taking a dog for toilet breaks may also stoke negative feelings among some colleagues.

A dog near Google headquarters

What about those with other types of pets? Some cats also suffer separation anxiety. Parrots (budgerigars, cockatiels, conures and others) also form strong attachments to humans and can become highly stressed when left alone.

Getting to work is also an equity issue. In many countries a pet-friendly workplace will require driving to work, because only registered assistance animals are allowed on public transport and in public spaces. It’s unfair if the only workers able to take advantage of a pet-friendly workplaces are those who can drive.

Bernese Mountain Dog laying on the floor of the train

What’s in it for the dog?

Even though most dog owners want to take their dog to work, it’s very important to ask if that really is in your pet’s best interest.

Yes, dogs are a highly social species; and yes, your dog likes to be around you. But, like humans, not every dog is a people person. For some dogs home is their safe space. Even with their “human” they may be stressed away from it.

Dogs, being sensitive to human emotions, may well feel stressed by your workplace if it also stresses you.

Other animal issues to consider include the presence of other dogs.

Organisational factors

A workplace therefore needs to consider multiple factors to make a pet-friendly policy work.

It needs to ensure the feelings of all workers have been considered, and whether the policy favours some at the expense of others.

In needs to ensure the work space is suitable for both human and animal well-being and hygiene. Though dogs’ space needs vary enormously, even the smallest dog needs space out of walkways and kick zones – being under a desk is not really suitable – as well as ready access to water bowls and outdoor toileting areas.

French Bulldog puppy lying on bed under desk in office whilst owner works

It needs policies codifying expected standards of behaviour – both human and animal. This may include requiring proof of proper socialisation, such as a certificate of basic obedience.

It needs procedures mapping out all contingencies. Owners should be responsible for cleaning up after their dogs and ensuring they do not cause disruption. But whose insurance will cover potential animal or human injuries, or damage to property? Do workers’ compensation policies cover animal-related incidents?

How to make pet-friendly work

It may seem we’re focusing on barriers to workplaces being dog-friendly. But assessing and addressing all the risks makes the likelihood of success much greater.

A useful document to help work through all the issues is the Pets at Work Tookit (funded by pet food maker Mars Petcare) which covers things from making a case to senior management to how to create a workplace pet policy.

Another useful document is the Safe Animal Friendly Environments multi-species companion-animal risk management tool developed in 2021 by University of South Australia researchers for the UK’s Society for Companion Animal Studies.

Though designed specifically to promote people entering aged care to keep their pets, this document includes a comprehensive list of risks, responsibilities and mitigation actions.

Small dog under desk in office.

So if taking your dog to work appeals to you, chat to your colleagues, identify the issues and put a policy in place.

It may prove to be a great thing for your colleagues, you and most of all your dog.

Janette Young, Lecturer in Health Promotion, University of South Australia and Saravana Kumar, Professor in Allied Health and Health Services Research, University of South Australia

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Tu opinión enriquece este artículo:

NFL 2026: por qué el fútbol americano (el deporte y sus valores) importa más que nunca (y por qué el show de medio tiempo es lo de menos)

(Por Maqueda, Taylor, Ortega y Maurizio) En 2026, cuando el Super Bowl es también un fenómeno de entretenimiento global, conviene defender una idea simple y casi contracultural: lo más relevante del fútbol americano no es lo que pasa en el escenario del entretiempo, sino lo que pasa en el campo… y lo que ese campo ha enseñado durante más de un siglo sobre la cultura competitiva de Estados Unidos. 

Lectura de alto valor estratégico, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Adrenalina y estrés: un cóctel peligroso (¿qué tipo de personalidad y qué tipo de organización fomentan este común flagelo?)

(Por la Dra. Sonia Abadi, una cocreación para la prestigiosa comunidad Beyond en colaboración con Infonegocios Miami) Creemos que la adrenalina es energía, excitación, motivación. En realidad, la adrenalina es la hormona de la lucha y, por lo tanto, una respuesta física ante situaciones que producen miedo. 

(Lectura de alto valor estratégico, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Super Bowl LX: la masterclass de estrategia que todos debemos aprender para el 2026 (y aplicarla en los negocios)

(Taylor-Ortega, colaboración Maurizio) Bajo las luces del Levi's Stadium, no se coronó solo a un campeón de la NFL. Se escribió el manual de una nueva era, donde la estrategia pura, ejecutada con precisión quirúrgica por una defensa joven (Cross de experiencia, muchas capacidades, juventud y mucho trabajo de equipo) derrotó a la tradición, “técnica” y fuerza.

(Lectura de alto valor estratégico, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Super Bowl LIX: Bad Bunny cayó en audiencias en TV y no rompió los récords de Usher y Kendrick Lamar, ni MJ (¿por qué medios dijeron lo contrario?)

(Por Maqueda-Maurizio-Taylor) Los datos finales de Nielsen para el Halftime Show del Super Bowl LIX son una cápsula de verdad en un mar de hipérbole digital. 128.2 millones de espectadores. No es un récord. Es, de hecho, una caída de 5.3 millones respecto al pico de 133.5 millones de 2025. 

(Lectura de alto valor estratégico, 4 minutos de lectura, material ideal para compartir)

El "Billionaire Bunker" no es una moda, es una estrategia geopolítica de élite (el manual no escrito al que se suscribe Zuckerberg)

(Por Taylor desde Silicon Beach, edición Maurizio) Cuando Mark Zuckerberg compra una propiedad en Indian Creek Village —esa isla privada de 41 mansiones apodada "Billionaire Bunker"— no está comprando una casa. Está adquiriendo una opción estratégica en el tablero geopolítico del capital global. Y con él, se completa una trinidad sagrada: Bezos (Amazon), Page (Google), Zuckerberg (Meta). Los tres fundadores del ecosistema digital que define el siglo XXI ahora tienen su búnker en el mismo kilómetro cuadrado de Florida.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Kylie Jenner y SKIMS: por qué esta campaña no es solo moda (una muestra más de la compleja era de las colaboraciones, phigitalidad y ecosistemas de marca)

(Por Vera- Rotmistrovsky y Maurizio) Esta colaboración, aparentemente sencilla, es en realidad un caso de estudio en estrategia de expansión de categorías, uso inteligente de celebridades y –sobre todo– una lección magistral en cómo conectar lo físico y lo digital en la mente del consumidor.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Inter Miami CF se corona como el club más valioso de la MLS (valuación histórica de U$$ 1.450 millones)

(Por ORTEGA) Inter Miami CF no solo hace historia en la cancha. Según Sportico, medio especializado en valuaciones deportivas a nivel global, la franquicia de Florida se consolida como el club más valioso de la Major League Soccer (MLS), con una valoración récord de USD$ 1.450 millones, marcando un crecimiento interanual del 22%, el más alto de la liga.

(Lectura de valor, 3 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

El gran error estratégico que la mayoría de marcas comenten (y que otras como Ferrari, Adidas, Mercedes y LVMH, corrigieron)

(Por Maurizio y Maqueda) Entre 2015 y 2020, una generación de marketineros —sobreestimulados por la fiebre de las métricas digitales— cometió uno de los errores estratégicos más costosos de la historia del mundo de los negocios: declarar muerto el marketing experiencial y físico. 

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Rhode Snow Club en Big Sky y Ulta Mate Retreat en Upstate New York (ejemplos claros de la supremacía del ecosistema de experiencias de marca)

(Por Maqueda, Otero y Maurizio) Rhode, Rare Beauty y otras firmas de alto perfil están mostrando que el verdadero poder ya no reside en un único canal, sino en un “head of culture” que orquesta un cruce de acciones: activaciones, celebri­ties, retail, contenido nativo, y experiencias inmersivas que viven en redes, buscadores y tiendas.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)