Google vs. Europe, once again: Brussels accuses Google of abusive practices in online advertising and suggests a solution: divesting part of its business

(By Infotech and Infonegocios Miami Staff Writers) The European Commission has filed charges against Google for monopolistic practices in the online advertising market and has proposed a drastic measure to resolve the conflict. This is not the first conflict between Europe and Google and relates to Google's excessive use of its quasi-monopoly power.

  • Conflict Introduction:

The European Commission has initiated a new legal battle against Google, accusing the company of maintaining a dominant position in the online advertising market. According to the regulator, these practices go against European competition rules, and the possibility of Google divesting part of its advertising business has been raised as a solution to the conflict. In this report, we will explain the details of the accusation and analyze the implications this could have on the digital market.

  • What consequences could the possible divestment of part of its advertising business have for Google?

The European Commission has made it clear that a fine would not be sufficient to resolve the conflict with Google.

  • What other measures could be taken to ensure fair competition in the market?

"The Commission's preliminary view is that only the mandatory divestiture by Google of part of its services would address these competition concerns." - European Commission

"Google has a very strong market position in the online advertising technology sector. Our preliminary concern is that Google may have used its market position to favor its own intermediation services." - Margrethe Vestager, Vice-President of the European Commission and Commissioner for Competition.

Check out our previous report on a mega-fine imposed on Google by the European Commission:

Google, “del código de la discordia” a la mayor multa de la Unión Europea

  • Complete analysis of the new conflict:

The European Commission has presented a list of charges against Google, accusing the company of monopolistic practices in the online advertising market. According to the regulator, Google has violated EU antitrust rules by distorting competition through its technological services, such as Google Ads, which act as intermediaries between advertisers and publishers to display ads on websites and mobile applications.

The European body has highlighted that Google operates on both sides of the market, with its ad server for publishers and its ad-buying tools, giving it a dominant position in the sector. This situation has created conflicts of interest and harmed competitors, publishers, and advertisers.

The Commission has raised the possibility of Google partially divesting its advertising business as a measure to address the competition issues. This measure, according to the regulator, would be more effective than a behavior-based solution.

  • Key tip: How could this situation affect advertisers and publishers in the online advertising market? We explore the potential consequences.

According to the Commission's investigation, Google may have favored its own AdX tool in the ad selection auction by providing insider information about competitors' bids to win the auction. Additionally, it has been noted that Google Ads and DV360, the company's ad-buying tools, may have also favored their own ad exchange, avoiding competition's ad exchanges and increasing AdX's competitiveness.

These practices, dating back to 2014, have led the European Commission to conclude that Google has a very strong market position in the online advertising sector, spanning various levels of the advertising technology supply chain.

Margrethe Vestager, Vice-President of the European Commission and Commissioner for Competition, has expressed concerns about the potential harm to Google's competitors, as well as the interests of publishers and the increased costs for advertisers. According to Vestager, if confirmed, these practices would be illegal under EU competition rules.

  • Google, on the other hand, has responded to the accusations by claiming that its advertising technology tools.

Google, on the other hand, has responded to the accusations by claiming that its advertising technology tools contribute to financing website and app content and enable businesses to effectively reach new customers. The company has stated that the Commission's investigation focuses on a limited aspect of its advertising business and has rejected the allegations.

  • What will happen next?

This conflict between the European Commission and Google could result in a significant fine for the company, as well as the obligation to divest part of its advertising business in Europe. The consequences of these actions could have a significant impact on the digital market and bring about changes in how technology companies operate in Europe.

The European Commission's accusation against Google for monopolistic practices in the online advertising market raises important questions about competition and fairness in the digital sector. As this conflict unfolds and decisions are made, it will be crucial to observe how competition concerns are addressed and what measures are implemented to ensure a fair and transparent market.

The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future investigations and regulations in the online advertising field.

Tu opinión enriquece este artículo:

El ritual como activo de marca: lo que Harvard no enseña en el MBA (y Corona sí)

(Por Maqueda-Maurizio) Aquí está el insight más profundo de esta campaña —y el que menos se está discutiendo en los análisis convencionales: El ritual de la lima no es un accidente de mercado. Es el activo competitivo más valioso que Corona posee. Y es el único que ningún competidor puede comprar, copiar ni patentar.

(Lectura de alto valor estratégico, 4 minutos; ideal para compartir y guardar)

F1 GP China 2026: Antonelli y Mercedes resucitan una dinastía, Ferrari muy cerca, Colapinto - Gasly brillan

(Por Vera - colaboración Maurizio- Maurizio) El Circuito Internacional de Shanghái fue testigo de un seísmo de poder que remeció los cimientos de la Fórmula 1 en 2026. Andrea Kimi Antonelli, el niño prodigio de Bolonia criado en la academia Mercedes, cruzó la meta en primer lugar y escribió su nombre en la historia con letras de titanio: primera victoria en la F1 a los 19 años. 

(Lectura de alto valor estratégico, 4 minutos; ideal para compartir y guardar)

El cumple de Antonella: un modelo y lecciones para ejecutivos y marcas

(Por Ortega- Vera- Edición Maurizio) Los directivos de las principales escuelas de negocios del mundo — Harvard Business School, IESE, Wharton — comparten un consenso emergente: el liderazgo del siglo XXI es profundamente personal antes de ser profesional.

(Lectura de valor , 4 minutos; ideal para compartir y guardar)

Argentina 2026: el mayor desembarco de marcas en LatAm (el mapa completo de todos los sectores comerciales)

(Por Rotmistrovsky-Maurizio-Mauvecin) Hay fenómenos económicos que se analizan con datos. Y hay fenómenos históricos que se entienden con perspectiva. Lo que está ocurriendo en Argentina en 2026 es, sin ninguna duda, el evento de expansión de marcas internacionales más significativo que ha vivido un mercado latinoamericano en las últimas tres décadas. 

(Lectura de valor , 4 minutos; ideal para compartir y guardar)

Eco tímido de empresarios del interior de Argentina ante la visión de Milei vs. la ovación de empresarios en el exterior

(Por Mauvecin- Arg.- Comercio Exterior y Rotmistrovsky - Pymes- USA-Paraguay-Arg.) La disonancia entre la esperanza, lo sistémico, científico, correcto, la verdad y… la realidad económica (temporal), el sesgo ideológico histórico, el ruido mediático, la ansiedad, la viejas costumbres, lo político, lo maquiavélico, la micro (ventas, heladera, platita). 

(Contenido colaborativo con redacción Miami, coproducido con Maurizio) (Lectura de alto valor estratégico, 5 minutos; ideal para compartir y guardar)