Dramatic collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX contains lessons for investors but won’t affect most people

(D. Brian Blank, Mississippi State University and Brandy Hadley, Appalachian State University) In the fast-paced world of cryptocurrency, vast sums of money can be made or lost in the blink of an eye. In early November 2022, the second-largest cryptocurrency exchange, FTX, was valued at more than US$30 billion. By Nov. 14, FTX was in bankruptcy proceedings along with more than 100 companies connected to it. D. Brian Blank and Brandy Hadley are professors who study finance, investing and fintech. They explain how and why this incredible collapse happened, what effect it might have on the traditional financial sector and whether you need to care if you don’t own any cryptocurrency.

 

1. What happened?

In 2019, Sam Bankman-Fried founded FTX, a company that ran one of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges.

FTX is where many crypto investors trade and hold their cryptocurrency, similar to the New York Stock Exchange for stocks. Bankman-Fried is also the founder of Alameda Research, a hedge fund that trades and invests in cryptocurrencies and crypto companies.

A photo of a curly-haired man.

Within the traditional financial sector, these two companies would be separate firms entirely or at least have divisions and firewalls in place between them. But in early November 2022, news outlets reported that a significant proportion of Alameda’s assets were a type of cryptocurrency released by FTX itself.

A few days later, news broke that FTX had allegedly been loaning customer assets to Alameda for risky trades without the consent of the customers and also issuing its own FTX cryptocurrency for Alameda to use as collateral. As a result, criminal and regulatory investigators began scrutinizing FTX for potentially violating securities law.

These two pieces of news basically led to a bank run on FTX.

Large crypto investors, like FTX’s competitor Binance, as well as individuals, began to sell off cryptocurrency held on FTX’s exchange. FTX quickly lost its ability to meet customer withdrawals and halted trading. On Nov. 14, FTX was also hit by an apparent insider hack and lost $600 million worth of cryptocurrency.

That same day, FTX, Alameda Research and 130 other affiliated companies founded by Bankman-Fried filed for bankruptcy. This action may leave more than a million suppliers, employees and investors who bought cryptocurrencies through the exchange or invested in these companies with no way to get their money back.

Among the groups and individuals who held currency on the FTX platform were many of the normal players in the crypto world, but a number of more traditional investment firms also held assets within FTX. Sequoia Capital, a venture capital firm, as well as the Ontario Teacher’s Pension, are estimated to have held millions of dollars of their investment portfolios in ownership stake of FTX. They have both already written off these investments with FTX as lost.

A magnifying glass over the word cryptocurrency.

2. Did a lack of oversight play a role?

In traditional markets, corporations generally limit the risk they expose themselves to by maintaining liquidity and solvency. Liquidity is the ability of a firm to sell assets quickly without those assets losing much value. Solvency is the idea that a company’s assets are worth more than what that company owes to debtors and customers.

But the crypto world has generally operated with much less caution than the traditional financial sector, and FTX is no exception. About two-thirds of the money that FTX owed to the people who held cryptocurrency on its exchange – roughly $11.3 billion of $16 billion owed – was backed by illiquid coins created by FTX. FTX was taking its customers’ money, giving it to Alameda to make risky investments and then creating its own currency, known as FTT, as a replacement – cryptocurrency that it was unable to sell at a high enough price when it needed to.

In addition, nearly 40% of Alameda’s assets were in FTX’s own cryptocurrency – and remember, both companies were founded by the same person.

This all came to a head when investors decided to sell their coins on the exchange. FTX did not have enough liquid assets to meet those demands. This in turn drove the value of FTT from over $26 a coin at the beginning of November to under $2 by Nov. 13. By this point, FTX owed more money to its customers than it was worth.

In regulated exchanges, investing with customer funds is illegal. Additionally, auditors validate financial statements, and firms must publish the amount of money they hold in reserve that is available to fund customer withdrawals. And even if things go wrong, the Securities Investor Protection Corporation – or SIPC – protects depositors against the loss of investments from an exchange failure or financially troubled brokerage firm. None of these guardrails are in place within the crypto world.

3. Why is this a big deal in crypto?

As a result of this meltdown, the company Binance is now considering creating an industry recovery fund – akin to a private version of SIPC insurance – to avoid future failures of crypto exchanges.

But while the collapse of FTX and Alameda – valued at more than $30 billion and now essentially worth nothing – is dramatic, the bigger implication is simply the potential lost trust in crypto. Bank runs are rare in traditional financial institutions, but they are increasingly common in the crypto space. Given that Bankman-Fried and FTX were seen as some of the biggest, most trusted figures in crypto, these events may lead more investors to think twice about putting money in crypto.

4. If I don’t own crypto, should I care?

Though investment in cryptocurrencies has grown rapidly, the entire crypto market – valued at over $3 trillion at its peak – is much smaller than the $120 trillion traditional stock market.

While investors and regulators are still evaluating the consequences of this fall, the impact on any person who doesn’t personally own crypto will be minuscule. It is true that many larger investment funds, like BlackRock and the Ontario Teachers Pension, held investments in FTX, but the estimated $95 million the Ontario Teachers Pension lost through the collapse of FTX is just 0.05% of the entire fund’s investments.

The takeaway for most individuals is not to invest in unregulated markets without understanding the risks. In high-risk environments like crypto, it’s possible to lose everything – a lesson investors in FTX are learning the hard way.

D. Brian Blank, Assistant Professor of Finance, Mississippi State University and Brandy Hadley, Associate Professor of Finance and the David A. Thompson Professor in Applied Investments, Appalachian State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

Tu opinión enriquece este artículo:

El gran error estratégico que la mayoría de marcas comenten (y que otras como Ferrari, Adidas, Mercedes y LVMH, corrigieron)

(Por Maurizio y Maqueda) Entre 2015 y 2020, una generación de marketineros —sobreestimulados por la fiebre de las métricas digitales— cometió uno de los errores estratégicos más costosos de la historia del mundo de los negocios: declarar muerto el marketing experiencial y físico. 

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Rhode Snow Club en Big Sky y Ulta Mate Retreat en Upstate New York (ejemplos claros de la supremacía del ecosistema de experiencias de marca)

(Por Maqueda, Otero y Maurizio) Rhode, Rare Beauty y otras firmas de alto perfil están mostrando que el verdadero poder ya no reside en un único canal, sino en un “head of culture” que orquesta un cruce de acciones: activaciones, celebri­ties, retail, contenido nativo, y experiencias inmersivas que viven en redes, buscadores y tiendas.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Louis Vuitton en la Fórmula 1 2026: la solidez de un encuentro entre lujo, velocidad y expansión de experiencias (¿qué nos enseña?)

(Por Marcelo Maurizio y Juan Maqueda) La Fórmula 1 (F1) no es solo un deporte; es un fenómeno cultural que ha captado la atención de millones en todo el mundo. Con un número creciente de carreras y una narrativa cautivadora impulsada por la serie de Netflix "Fórmula 1: Drive to Survive", este deporte ha logrado trascender su naturaleza competitiva para convertirse en un espectáculo multidimensional. 

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Miami lo tiene todo, incluso una carrera internacional en chancleta: llega la primera Red Bull Chancleta Run (by 305 DAY® y Red Bull)

(Por Vera y Ortega, producción Maurizio) La ciudad de Miami acoge otra vez la innovación en entretenimiento deportivo. En el marco del 305 DAY® Community Festival 2026, se presenta la Red Bull Chancleta Run, una carrera de chancletas que combina cultura local, competencia directa y una experiencia de marca sumamente articulada para cautivar audiencias en múltiples plataformas. 

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Boca Grande: el destino exótico y glamuroso, imperdible del 2026

(Por Vera, edición Maurizio) Con su encanto histórico, playas de arena blanca y una vibrante cultura, Boca Grande no solo atrae a turistas de habla inglesa, sino también a la comunidad anglolatina, que buscan experiencias auténticas y memorables.

(Lectura de 4 minutos de lectura)

El Gran Engaño del Siglo XXI: por qué la humanidad sigue eligiendo sus propias cadenas (y qué nos enseñan Matrix, Equilibrium, Metrópolis y Fahrenheit 451 sobre el único antídoto)

(Por Rodriguez Otero- Mauvecin- Maurizio, un contenido exclusivo cocreado con Beyond) Existe una pregunta que atraviesa 2.500 años de filosofía, 130 años de cine y cada línea de código de inteligencia artificial escrita en 2026: ¿Por qué las sociedades, una y otra vez, entregan voluntariamente su libertad a cambio de la promesa de orden, igualdad, seguridad o eficiencia?

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

El "Billionaire Bunker" no es una moda, es una estrategia geopolítica de élite (el manual no escrito al que se suscribe Zuckerberg)

(Por Taylor desde Silicon Beach, edición Maurizio) Cuando Mark Zuckerberg compra una propiedad en Indian Creek Village —esa isla privada de 41 mansiones apodada "Billionaire Bunker"— no está comprando una casa. Está adquiriendo una opción estratégica en el tablero geopolítico del capital global. Y con él, se completa una trinidad sagrada: Bezos (Amazon), Page (Google), Zuckerberg (Meta). Los tres fundadores del ecosistema digital que define el siglo XXI ahora tienen su búnker en el mismo kilómetro cuadrado de Florida.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)

Kylie Jenner y SKIMS: por qué esta campaña no es solo moda (una muestra más de la compleja era de las colaboraciones, phigitalidad y ecosistemas de marca)

(Por Vera- Rotmistrovsky y Maurizio) Esta colaboración, aparentemente sencilla, es en realidad un caso de estudio en estrategia de expansión de categorías, uso inteligente de celebridades y –sobre todo– una lección magistral en cómo conectar lo físico y lo digital en la mente del consumidor.

(Lectura de valor, 4 minutos de lectura, material idea para compartir)